Oh how I want to see that film. Not only for the inevitable comedy value, but also to stop the careers of some of our least treasured performers. I don't mind Arnold though. The Terminator films are good.
Also, you said the make-up took 6 hours each day, but also said the whole film was produced in a day :P
Yeah I agree with Tom. There is nothing wrong with Arnie. Just a considerable lack of acting skills...but this does help him when playing an advanced cyborg. His films are entertaining too (if a little shallow).
If this film is so bad, how did it get an average of 1.7? Was it people reading the scale backwards? Saying it was so bad it was good? How?
4 Comments:
Oh how I want to see that film. Not only for the inevitable comedy value, but also to stop the careers of some of our least treasured performers. I don't mind Arnold though. The Terminator films are good.
Also, you said the make-up took 6 hours each day, but also said the whole film was produced in a day :P
That film sounds so good.... *rolls eyes*
Having catherine tate as an aubergine would be funny!
That's a good post! The kind we read the blog for...
The best comedy is in the clipped sentences with the (more) links - I love the subtle implications.
A 4 thumbs up for you!
Yeah I agree with Tom. There is nothing wrong with Arnie. Just a considerable lack of acting skills...but this does help him when playing an advanced cyborg. His films are entertaining too (if a little shallow).
If this film is so bad, how did it get an average of 1.7? Was it people reading the scale backwards? Saying it was so bad it was good? How?
Post a Comment
<< Home